In the
The central argument contrasts
But what is the context? Is there a current debate about strategy among republicans or a debate in the socialist movement where the important thing is to put forward a socialist critique of militarism? No there is not. What there is, is an attempt by the remaining republicans to relaunch their military campaign, countered by hysterical demands for their repression, led by
Socialists oppose the militarist tactics of the RIRA, but we believe that republicans and socialists should oppose a settlement that is sectarian and undemocratic. We should oppose Sinn Fein’s lick-spittle hypocrisy, the calls for repression by the nationalist reactionaries and the attempts to advance further a police offensive in nationalist areas.
Although Eamonn knows all this, like all economist socialists he falls behind the popular mood. The fact that the next day he finds himself protesting when the RUC/PSNI refuse medical treatment to a republican whose arm they have broken in three places just shows the confusion that this position can get you into, a confusion magnified by McCann’s place in court as a defendant in the Raytheon 9 case – McCann’s own milder version of the direct action he decries in RIRA
The current imperialist settlement is no longer up than it is decaying from its own corruption. It so bad that even a movement as politically bankrupt as republican militarism can begin to revive. In no small measure this is due to the reluctance of the left to lead any principled opposition to the reactionary Stormont regime. Once Eamonn would have told us that that imperialism was responsible for the endemic violence in
.
4 comments:
good to see the site up and running - will drop an article soon on the McCann piece
" Is there a current debate about strategy among republicans or a debate in the socialist movement where the important thing is to put forward a socialist critique of militarism?"
This fails to take account of the analysis of the IRSP and its continuing critique of "militarism" from the mid ninties. Read the account in the Plough1967-2007 An overview
The word was 'current'. I am not familiar with the IRSP article. If ther is a link I will read it, but I don't see the connection with the McCann piece
Given that the INLA was the most militarist of the armed republican groups I'd be very interested to see a self criticism. The IRSP just seemed to have followed the Provos ending their campaign and I remember their ambiguous comments about the peace process. If the IRSP really have a critique of militarism they can post it here and we can all have a look at it.
Post a Comment